Stop guessing what your organisation thinks.
AskWise runs short, role-aware conversations across your organisation and turns them into a single decision-ready report — with counts, quotes, and contradictions clearly laid out.
Collect
Ask 5–10 minute adaptive questions tailored to role and context — no long surveys, no wasted time.
Synthesize
Automatically surface themes backed by numbers and verbatim quotes — not opinions or gut feel.
Recommend
See where action will actually move the needle — with effort vs. impact clearly spelled out.
Decision-ready insight, not raw feedback.
AskWise turns messy, conflicting input into a single report leaders can trust — because every conclusion is tied to evidence.
Shorten decision cycles
End debates faster by grounding discussions in shared evidence.
Defensible narratives
Every theme is backed by counts and real quotes — so conclusions are defensible, not political.
Focused recommendations
Recommendations are bounded — you see what matters now, and what can wait.
Clear accountability
Clear evidence trails make alignment across leadership faster and less emotional.
How it works
From goal to report in four steps.
Set the goal
Capture what leaders need to know and who should answer.
Launch the interview
Adaptive prompts branch by role and keep the flow short.
Aggregate evidence
Counts, quotes, and contradictions are stitched automatically.
Act with clarity
Recommendations are bounded with effort and impact hints.
Comparison
Traditional Discovery vs AskWise
Traditional interviews vs AskWise for 50–100 employee scale-ups.
| Dimension | Traditional (consultant-led / manual internal) | AskWise (nudge + adaptive interviews + automated insights) |
|---|---|---|
| Time-to-insight | ~4–6 weeks (scheduling + batching + synthesis) | ~5–9 business days (typical run) |
| Internal touch time | ~60–120 hours (coordination, chasing, synthesis) | ~4–7 hours (setup + light review) |
| Scheduling overhead | High (calendar slots, reschedules, no-shows) | Low (async micro-inputs via chat, email fallback) |
| Participation / completion | Hard to track (completion depends on chasing) | ~70–90% completion (with automated nudges (typical)) |
| Evidence traceability | Often manual (scattered, hard to audit) | 60–80% evidence-backed insights (linked to docs (typical)) |
| Consistency across runs | One-off (depends on who runs it) | Repeatable (reusable templates) |
| AskWise Cost Savings | 100 employees |
|---|---|
| Consultant-days avoided(numbers relevant for 100 employees) | 12–18 days |
| Cost saving per cycle(numbers relevant for 100 employees) | €24k–€36k |
Figures shown are illustrative for 12–25 respondents and a single insight cycle; actual results vary by scope, channels, and evidence requirements.
Trust and safety
Built to protect respondent trust.
PII redaction
Quotes are scrubbed by default to avoid exposing identities.
Evidence over invention
Every claim is tied to source responses or marked as insufficient.
Anonymity thresholds
K-anonymity checks prevent narrow exposure.
Prompt safety
Respondent input is isolated from system instructions.
Ready to run your first interview?
Bring clarity to your next decision.
AskWise keeps interviews short while delivering evidence you can cite in leadership rooms. Start with a focused goal and see the report take shape.